17.07.2019

Which processor is better than mediatek or qualcomm. MediaTek vs Qualcomm: competitor testing. Which mobile processor is better


Everyone who is interested in the novelties of the Chinese electronics market once wondered which processor to choose: 64-bit Mediatek MT6752 or 64-bit Qualcomm Snapdragon 615? let's have a battle for these 64-bit giants.

V recent times the slogan "64-bit processor" is gaining more and more popularity among newly released digital devices. Manufacturers use it like a magic word to promote their new products on the market. 64-bit processors have become a real discovery, as they open up previously unavailable opportunities for users, endowing portable devices all new and new features.



There are many 64-bit processors currently on the market, but the real leaders among their competitors are Qualcomm's Mediatek MT6752 and Snapdragon 615. Both of these chips are widely used in medium to high power smartphones. But which one is still the best?
For this article, we took two popular models. Chinese phones that run on 64-bit chips: on the Qualcomm side, this is the Oppo R5 smartphone, and on the Mediatek side, the iOcean MT6752 Rock. During our experiment, we put both phones under several tests to see which of the two chips gives the best performance. Before we get started, let's take a look at the specs and features of both processors.


However, this price difference allows us to choose between buying a mobile phone with a low performance processor but compatible with the best technology and buying a mobile phone with a higher performance processor but may have more problems. There are two options that we will have to take into account from now on.

And these smartphones usually have the same processors. What's the best? These three processors are quite similar. Why talk about these three smartphones? Because, in general, the processors that are present in mid-range smartphones, the mid-core range and the mid-range of the modern market. And it is not easy to determine which processor is better than another, simply by the number of cores or by its clock frequency. In fact, it is quite difficult to differentiate at the processor level.






MT6752 operates with 8 cores 1.7GHz ARM Cortex-53 and Mali-T760 GPU - a new level of 64-bit chips for mobile computers with support for 4G LTE. Supports up to 16 megapixel camera with 1080p @ 60fps video recording.
The Snapdragon 615 is the first 64-bit Cortex-A53 octa-core processor in the electronics industry. It consists of 4 cores at 1.7GHz and 4 cores at 1GHz. Adreno 405 GPU supports maximum screen resolution up to 2560 * 1600 and cameras up to 21 megapixels.
Both processors have their own characteristics and advantages. So, Mediatek is focused on higher performance, and Snapdragon 615 is more focused on the use of media resources.
Now that we know more about each of the processors, let's start analyzing the test results and see which of the chips has more impressive capabilities.

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: Vellamo



Vellamo tests processors on two main parameters: HTML5 Browser Chapter evaluates performance mobile web browsers, while Metal Chapter measures the performance of each core in a mobile processor system. Vellamo is able to measure the quality of scrolling and zooming, 3D graphics, video and read / write performance, bandwidth and more.

Three clusters for powering gadgets that we will see in the coming months. Apart from the entrance terminals or mid-level, there are a few representatives that are most interesting and have nothing to envy of those who carry chips from the Americans. Their problem is that they are shy and have not been noticed by others in Europe and America. It will start to go on sale soon in China and some neighboring countries. It promises to be one of the most interesting terminals, and this time it will also expand outside of China.

Impeccable design, very thin frames and a good selection of materials. We gave you all your specs in a blog post a while ago. A priori, a phone with few gaps and a lot to offer at a price that will hover around 300 euros. The bad news, like most of the phones on this list, is that we won't get to see it because for now, this manufacturer's adventures are limited to the local market.

results this test very similar. This means that both processors have similar scaling, 3D graphics and video capabilities.

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: Ludashi



The Android version of Ludashi is an application performance test designed for mobile devices on the Android platform. With it, you can easily test the performance of your phone and compare it with others. Based on the results of this test, it can be seen that the results of the iOcean based on the M6752 outperform the results of the OPPO R5. The core performance of the M6752 that powers the iOcean is nearly double that of Oppo's Snapdragon.
Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: Game Performance Test Results
Since both experimental phones have a 1080p screen resolution, their SOC will consume the same amount of battery power. We will test SOC differences on several of the most popular games.
The iOcean M6752 has a Mali-T760 GPU. Speed ​​when entering the main menu of the Need game for Speed normal, but the graphics performance of the Mali GPU decreases during the game.
OPPO R5 uses Adreno 405 GPU, which has better performance in general. However, according to the results of graphics testing, both phones are approximately on the same level, and the MT6752 scores are not worse than the Snapdragon 615.



In terms of other games, the performance of the iOcean M6752 and OPPO R5 is almost the same. Generally speaking, both phones performed well.
NBA 2015, a recently released game, requires a valid powerful processor and modern GPU... On the iOcean M6752, the game runs fairly freely, only minor lags occur occasionally. As for the Qualcomm Snapdragon 615, this processor has seriously disappointed us. The 2015 NBA was overwhelming for him.

We may not see it officially, but it will certainly be seen in China's online stores. Meticulous design, competitive specs, but with the same problem as the other phones on this list, it's very difficult to see you in Spain. The good news, of course, is that it is easier to find than other brands and soon we will have the simplest model for just 200 euros.

Your name may not be very inspiring, but its specs, design and price make it a very interesting phone. Removing this little detail - a smartphone with a good value for money. The result was not bad: a high-quality screen, well-finished and a processor whose size ranges as competitive and is difficult to distinguish as intermediate terminals.

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: Conclusion



While both processors are impressive on paper and can handle all the demands of modern applications and games, the MT6752 that the iOcean MT6752 is equipped with proved to be stronger in practice.
In daily use, both processors will handle most applications just fine. But when it comes to really heavy workloads, 64-bit Mediatek guarantees smooth, high-quality data processing. In our opinion, Oppo made a huge mistake by opting for the Snapdragon 615 over the Mediatek MT6752, not only because the MTK chip is more powerful, but also because it would help bring the phone's price down to $ 200, while Oppo is now pricing at $ 500.

At one time they came out with a price tag of € 300 and now it is easy to find it for anything less. One of the first eight cores we tested and a terminal worth taking a look at its timing. His most interesting models come very discreetly, and good example this is. We may have a little more luck this year, but all indications are that they will remain quite stressful with mobile phones and we will not see only representatives. When we talk about trends that have generated interest from manufacturers and consumers of consumer electronics, we have highlighted the emergence of two camera systems and virtual reality.

AnTuTu Snapdragon 615 test:







* translation of an article from Gizchina

Recently MediaTek processors are a serious competitor to their counterparts manufactured by Qualcomm. We present to your attention the test results of direct competitors in Geekbench and GFXBench applications.

Image remains one of the characteristics in which companies place more emphasis on both work and means, as well as one of the areas in which the public is more demanding. However, as we've told you on other occasions, the tablets and smartphones we use every day should be viewed together as a single support made up of dozens of components that work together to deliver the greatest global experience possible.

The ability to easily launch applications, browse smoothly, or quickly open a terminal gallery won't exist without processors. Present since the beginning of this year, this chip has become a component manufacturer's bet to achieve best devices on the market. Among its advantages, we find a structure of 10 cores that operate independently, compared to 8 or 4 that make up most processors today, and maximum frequency 2.5GHz. This system "turns off" kernels that are not in use and does not allow them to be disabled.

First, let's compare the performance of the junior line of chips from both manufacturers. So, against Snapdragon 410.

Specifications:

  • MT6732: 28nm process technology, 4-core Cortex A53, 2-core GPU Mali-T760
  • Snapdragon 410: 28 nm process technology, 4-core Cortex A53, GPU Adreno 306


In the middle class compete against Snapdragon 615.

According to the developers, this allows for a 30% longer battery life compared to its predecessors. For this reason, devices that leave in the coming months will try to collect currents that have emerged during this year. However, to support functions with very high resolution it is necessary that new tablets and smartphones have very powerful processors.

Timing is another decisive factor, as the arrival of the Taiwanese company's new chips must be launched at the same time as its rivals in order to gain prominence. Speed ​​and performance are still key areas of devices, even though the protagonists of delivering good results in both areas are identified as almost invisible. Do you think that the firm is still perceived by the public as a company that can only aim for the middle and entry ranges, and that it will be difficult to position itself as a referent in the most powerful tablets and smartphones? So that you can give your opinion.

Specifications:

  • MT6752: 28nm process technology, 8-core Cortex A53, 2-core GPU Mali-T760
  • Snapdragon 615: 28 nm process technology, 8-core Cortex A53, GPU Adreno 405



Finally, top-class processors: against Snapdragon 810

In some cases, one device can be found with a variant equipped with a processor from each company, further increasing consumer doubts. Everything is based primarily on architectural issues. More cores usually mean more power and better multitasking, but this will depend on many microarchitectures. In addition, the larger the core set, the more power is required to run them, which almost always results in an increase in temperature and battery usage.

Since it has a much lower cost, several companies generally choose to accept these devices as they may offer mobile phones with very similar performance to more attractive models across intermediate price ranges. It all depends on your ability to analyze options. It should be remembered that this will provide even more energy efficiency.

Specifications:

  • MT6795: 28nm process technology, 8-core Cortex A53, G6200 GPU with dual-channel LPDDR3 @ 900 MHz
  • Snapdragon 810: 20 nm process technology, 4-core Cortex A57 + 4-core Cortex A53, GPU Adreno 430 with dual-channel LPDDR4



In addition, we have the option of using cameras with 24 megapixels or with a dual module of 13 megapixels, including compatibility with optical zoom. Because of this, expect more than satisfactory performance for all tasks, from complex applications to games requiring more High Quality graphics.

Leave your comment below! Smartphones have a wide variety of specifications that can categorize them into niches: entry, reseller, or top line. But what determines which “segment” a smartphone belongs to? And it all depends on the processor that the device uses.

What do we see from the test results?

At the bottom end, MediaTek outperforms Qualcomm in both CPU and GPU benchmarks.

In the middle class, MediaTek MT6752 has a slight advantage in graphic tests and in the single-core processor benchmark, but far outperforms the competitor in the multi-core CPU benchmark.

Therefore, processors are a key component to indicate the performance of a smartphone. Each series has technologies that allow you to use certain functions. For example, different generations can support Various types connections, graphics quality and multitasking. Each series has technologies that allow you to use certain functions.

It is important to remember that the more cores and higher clock frequency, the better the performance of the device. The fabrication from the model is based on 28nm architecture. Present in input devices and intermediaries, the platforms of this line strive to offer the user what the smartphone of this niche needs.

Finally, in the top segment, the MediaTek MT6795 only shows the best result in the multi-core processor test. In the single-core, we see the opposite situation: Snapdragon 810 is faster than the competitor. And in graphic tests, the situation for MTK is completely depressing: the processor from Qualcomm is 2-3 times faster than its competitor.

If you believe the claims of executives at Qualcomm that, then this processor has every chance of success in future flagship devices. However, traditionally it will use a strategy of more low prices, so we are confident that she will not be left without large orders.

From simpler models to more efficient models. The chip is interesting, but its graphical part disappoints a little. Therefore, it was necessary to wait for long months between formalization and the availability of the finished product. And in practice, what does it give? This, unfortunately, is a victim of her success: she is hard to find and sometimes more expensive than when she was released. Storage: 16GB expandable to 64GB.

We'll only regret the placement of the ignition button and bulky black borders. You can find our test. Attention, idol 3 is available in two versions, la and 5 inches. 7 inches are less versatile, they are 2 perfectly different smartphones... You can't go wrong with this smartphone. It offers a design that everyone has known for some time and a fairly clean copy. Solid performance level device. Premium design and new coat. For the toughest budgets, check out our entry-level 64-bit devices.


2021
maccase.ru - Android. Brands. Iron. news