Processor battle: Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615

How does the 64-bit Mediatek MT6752 compare to the 64-bit Qualcomm Snapdragon 615?

At the time of this writing, the main topic of the mobile market was the phrase "64-bit processor". The term was spoken like a spell on every corner and was heavily used by marketers to promote devices. A 64-bit processor is an important step, but not only because of the 64-bit chip, but also other additional features that it brings to portable devices.

There are enough 64-bit chips on the market today, but the most talked about are the Mediatek MT6752 and Qualcomm's Snapdragon 615. Both chips are used in many mid-range and high-end smartphones, but which one is better?

This article compares two popular Chinese phones with 64-bit chips. Qualcomm stands on the side, and the honor of Mediatek is protected by the iOcean MT6752 Rock. Both phones have been subjected to popular benchmarking tests to find out which gives the best performance. Until we get down to comparison and results, let's take a look at the specs and functions of both processors.

The MT6752 has eight ARM Cortex-53 cores at 1.7 GHz and a Mali-T760 GPU, it has 4G LTE support. The processor is capable of supporting a camera up to 16 MP, and video recording is possible in 1080p resolution at 60 frames per second.

In turn, Snapdragon 615 introduces the industry's first 64-bit octa-core Cortex-A53 CPU. This chip has 4 cores and 1.7 GHz and 4 at 1 GHz. The Adreno 405 GPU can support screen resolutions up to 2560x1600 pixels and cameras up to 21 MP.

Both chips have their advantages: Mediatek seems to be more performance oriented, while Snapdragon 615 seems to be more media entertainment oriented.

Now we can take a closer look at the processors and their capabilities during the tests and see which one performs the best.

Mediatek MT6752 vs. Snapdragon 615: Vellamo App

Vellamo started out as a mobile online tester and has since expanded to two main parts. The HTML5 part measures the performance of mobile devices while surfing the net, and the Metal part measures the single-core performance of the CPU subsystem of mobile processors.

Vellamo is capable of evaluating scrolling and zooming, 3D graphics, video performance, internal memory speed, peak bandwidth and more.

In this web test, the performance looks about the same. This means that in scaling, loading, 3D graphics and video streaming, they will give customers the same performance.

Mediatek MT6752 vs. Snapdragon 615: Ludashi App

The Android version of Ludashi is a performance checker app for phones and tablets. With 8 tests, you can easily determine the performance of a mobile device and compare it with another.

Ultimately, the OPPO R5's results are far behind what the iOcean M6752 has to offer. This means that the single-core performance of the M6752 is better than that of the OPPO R5, as the MT6752's results are almost double that of the Snapdragon.

Mediatek MT6752 vs. Snapdragon 615: Gaming Performance

Since both phones have a 1080p screen, their SoC must use the same amount of power. In this test, the SoC difference was determined using well-known games.

The iOcean M6752 smartphone is equipped with a Mali-T760 GPU. The speed at the exit to the main screen of the game Need for Speed ​​is nominal, but the Mali GPU loses a little in the overall graphic clarity.

In turn, the OPPO R5 has an Adreno 405 graphics card, which performed better overall. While smoothness and quality are excellent on both phones, the overall gaming experience on the Snapdragon 615 is as good as on the MT6752.

NBA 2015 is a fresh game at that time, requiring good performance from the processor and graphics card. The iOcean M6752 is quite free to play the game, only slowing down a couple of times, while the Snapdragon 615 really disappointed in this game. The processor had a lot of gameplay issues and the overall image looked sluggish.

Other tests:

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: Conclusion

While both processors offer high standards on paper and seem like they can handle anything, in fact the MT6752 in the iOcean MT6752 fared much better.

For most applications, each of the processors is good enough, but when it comes to anything complex, Mediatek's 64-bit processor can turn on the afterburner and handle heavy workloads intelligently and smoothly. It seems to me that Oppo made a big mistake by using the Snapdragon 615 instead of the Mediatek MT6752 in their device. Not only because the MTK chip is more powerful, but also because it helps bring down the price of the phone. This explains why iOcean are selling their phone internationally for just over $ 200, while Oppo's price is approaching $ 500.

If you have dealt with any of these processors, please share your opinion in the comments.